Old parks are great for mature and veteran trees, both living and dead. Where trees have died, have become unsafe, or even if there is a general lack of deadwood habitat, a tree may be monolithed or left standing with its principal structure left in tact. This is the case with this oak, which for whatever reason has ‘suffered’ (wrong word!) this fate.
In this instance, I am glad to see that the deadwood has not been removed from beneath the tree. In many cases, the standing deadwood will remain but the removed material is transported off site. Ecologically, this is not as desirable as if the deadwood remains beneath the tree. Not only can the nutrients be mineralised back into the soil from where the nutrients were taken up from, but there’s a greater variety of deadwood habitats within such a small space, which may provide habitat for a greater number of species (or simply support more of the same species, as there is a great mass of deadwood). In the second image, we can see how fungi have colonised the fallen branch wood and are releasing nutrients back into the soil.


Don’t wish to be pedantic but is that not just a dead tree rather than a monolith ? I always assumed a monolith would only have the stem remaining.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Fair point! I’ll change the title accordingly on this one. I’ve considered monoliths to also be the principal structure, though in the truest sense of the word I would agree with you and say this isn’t a ‘true’ monolith.
LikeLike